Peer Review Process

EDUCATION TRACKER JOURNAL maintains the standards of peer review while increasing the efficiency of the process. All research articles published in Tomorrow's Education Journal undergo full peer review, key characteristics of which are listed below:

  • All research articles are reviewed by at least two suitably qualified reviewers. Several reviewers involve in this journal that comes from focused discipline-based. There are some criteria by which reviewers judge the submissions by applying for a Double Blind Peer Review. In other word, there is no communication between author and reviewer, or the author's identity is not provided for the reviewers and vice versa.

  • All publication decisions are made by the journals’ Editors-in-Chief on the basis of the reviews provided

  • Members of the international Editorial Boards lend insight, advice, and guidance to the Editors-in-Chief generally and to assist decision making on specific submissions

  • Managing Editors and Editorial Assistants provide the administrative support that allows EDUCATION TRACKER JOURNAL to maintain the integrity of peer review while delivering rapid turnaround and maximum efficiency to authors, reviewers, and editors alike.

  • EDUCATIONAL TRACKER JOURNAL additionally benefits through the manuscript referral process from the high-quality peer review conducted by established journal

Peer review of referred papers:

Editors of EDUCATION TRACKER JOURNAL will decide promptly whether to accept, reject, or request revisions of referred papers based on the reviews and editorial insight of the supporting journals. In addition, Editors will have the option of seeking additional reviews when needed. The authors will be advised when Editors decide further review is needed.

Peer review of novel submissions:

Articles submitted directly to EDUCATION TRACKER JOURNAL will be fully peer-reviewed by at least two appropriately qualified experts in the field selected by the Editor-in-Chief. The Editor-in-Chief or a designated member of the Editorial Board will then decide whether to accept, reject or request revisions based on the reviews and comments received.

The criteria present a strict surveillance from the editorial board in order to keep the journal content to be more qualified and original. Therefore, it takes several days to read the reviewers’ biography before recruiting them. It takes at least four weeks to conduct the reviews starting from the invitation to the review report.

Editors will decide whether each submission reports well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper. Assessments of priority will not be a factor in decision-making, but all papers must make an incremental or novel addition to the literature.